Highlighting an inaccurate diagram in Szostak’s article, Tour made an off-the-cuff remark about Szostak, telling the audience that “he’s lying to you.” It was an uncharitable characterization. To Tour’s credit, when he was challenged on his use of the term “lying,” he apologized directly to Szostak by phone, and he followed up with a statement to someone else, which he authorized for release to the public. The two-sentence statement has been widely use… Authoring over 500 research publications over the past 30 years, Dr. Tour has received awards and recognition from the American Chemical Society, Thomas Reuters, Honda, NASA, and others. The latter two are troubling in light of the text which mentions iron cyanide. Whether a popular piece or original research, the article in question was published with the backing of one of the world’s most prestigious science journals and written by one of the world’s leading authorities on origin of life research. http://www.thebestschools.org/features/50-influential-scientists-world-today. In 2014, Thomson Reuters named him one of “The World’s Most Influential Scientific Minds,” and in 2018 Clarivate Analytics recognized him as one of the world’s most highly cited researchers. (function($) {window.fnames = new Array(); window.ftypes = new Array();fnames[1]='NAME';ftypes[1]='text';fnames[3]='MMERGE3';ftypes[3]='text';fnames[0]='EMAIL';ftypes[0]='email';fnames[2]='ZIP';ftypes[2]='zip';fnames[4]='SIGNUP';ftypes[4]='text';fnames[5]='FNAME';ftypes[5]='text';fnames[6]='LNAME';ftypes[6]='text';}(jQuery));var $mcj = jQuery.noConflict(true); Eric Hovind grew up immersed in the world of apologetics and following college graduation in 1999, he began full-time ministry. Blowing smoke happens also to be what science media and even scientists themselves do a great deal of the time when they talk about the origin of life. So this particular complaint is much ado about nothing. He has authored 680 scientific publications and holds more than 120 patents (here is a partial list). As he puts it, “Molecules don’t care about life.” They “don’t evolve. According to Hurd, Tour was lying as well when he claimed that the diagram labeled “RNA nucleotide” in Szostak’s article was inaccurate. Do Origin-of-Life Researchers Now Accept Intelligent Design? Do Origin-of-Life Researchers Now Accept Intelligent Design? The problems are extremely formidable, as he notes in a quick preview: That’s an excerpt from a presentation Professor Tour gave to Andrews University on the theme “Scientists Are Clueless on the Origin of Life.” About seven or eight years ago I posted on my website that I don’t understand. Tour is also fearless. “Editorially independent” means not that Szostak’s article was independent from Nature, but that it was independent from the influence of funders. The content was “already deemed worthy of coverage by our editorial departments… The ultimate approval of any story rests with the editorial department.” So the article in question was definitely published by Nature — just like Tour said. Careful examination of the evidence for Darwinian theory should be encouraged." In this video from 2012, Tour explains his experience with making molecules. He has doubts about evolution (and also about intelligent design! Shouldn’t a famous chemist of this caliber be able to understand the science behind the claims of evolution? But that is only to fill the valance states. Even with his many scientific accolades, Dr. Tour readily admits evolution holds no fact-filled answer as to mankind’s origin. You can watch that Friday, right here: If so, would you donate so it can continue? According to Hurd, Tour was lying when he criticized as scientifically inaccurate two figures in Jack Szostak’s article labeled “Simple sugars.” When I asked Tour about this criticism, he responded that Szostak himself conceded to him that these figures were inaccurate! In January, Tour delivered a lecture on “The Mystery of the Origin of Life” to an audience of nearly 1,000 at a Discovery Institute conference in Dallas. Instead, Hurd obsesses about four minutes where Tour criticizes one short article. Again, no error, and certainly no lie. Tour’s response to me: “it is not a nucleotide since it is devoid of any stereochemistry.” Again, the charge that Tour doesn’t understand basic chemistry seems to evaporate. Once again, the charge that Tour was lying or incompetent disintegrates. I have sat with them, and when I get them alone, not in public—because it’s a scary thing, if you say what I just said—I say, ‘Do you understand all of this, where all of this came from, and how this happens?’ Every time that I have sat with people who are synthetic chemists, who understand this, they go, ‘Uh-uh. They are stupid obvious lies.”. Can I count on your support? They don’t move toward life.” This is not a presentation about God, as he warns at the outset, nor about intelligent design. It’s a rousing reminder that science remains without real information, of any kind, about the ultimate mystery. Hurd’s rhetoric makes Tour’s off-the-cuff swipe at Szostak seem genteel. There are so many steps involved in such a transformation. Shown are a diol and a triol. Such heretical views can get you into trouble. They are not even sophisticated lies. Ann Gauger, PhDScientist and Evolution News Author, Photo: Screenshot from "Molecules Don’t Care About Life. That definitely makes the article fair game for Tour and others to criticize. In January, Tour delivered a lecture on “The Mystery of the Origin of Life” to an audience of nearly 1,000 at a Discovery Institute conference in Dallas. He is not a geneticist, an ecologist, a biologist, or most importantly, an evolutionary biologist. Photo: James Tour interviewing Stephen Meyer. 2. President and Founder of Pensacola-based organization, Creation Today, Eric’s passion to reach people with the life-changing message of the Gospel has driven him to speak in five foreign countries and all fifty states. ), but none about the Bible. Is Tour really a serial liar who, in less than four minutes, shows that he doesn’t understand undergraduate level chemistry? Tour was right to apologize. Let me tell you what goes on in the back rooms of science—with National Academy members, with Nobel Prize winners. The problems are extremely formidable, as he notes in a quick preview: That’s an excerpt from a presentation Professor Tour gave to Andrews University on the theme “Scientists Are Clueless on the Origin of Life.” It premieres on Friday, September 11, at 10 am Pacific time/1 pm Eastern. And yet, Dr. James Tour cannot understand how evolution can explain the origin of life. Part of Tour’s statement read: That was a strong word (“lying”) which I regret saying. Hurd further accuses Tour of lying because Tour declared that Szostak’s article was published by the journal Nature. And, his lies are exposed by undergraduate level chemistry. Tour wrote me: As listed, the sugars do not look like sugars. Tour’s public talks sizzle, and his rollicking Dallas lecture was no exception. Nearly 900 scientists, including Tour, have currently signed, A Scientific Dissent from Darwinism, which expresses skepticism in the claims of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. Now all we need is for Dr. Tour to become a Young Earth Creationist! We rely completely on readers like you to make our articles possible. Moreover, the convention is that all heteroatoms should bear the hydrogen atoms. But anyone who watches Tour’s entire lecture can easily see that all Hurd offers is (at best) a skirmish at the edges. For his frankness, Tour is being vilified by detractors as an attention-grabbing charlatan, an incompetent scientist, and even a “Liar for Jesus”! So one needs to see the pi bonds if we are omitting the hydrogen atoms. Friday here in Seattle we are expecting a huge cloud of wildfire smoke, blowing up from Oregon and California. Eric Hovind wants everyone to be a HERO. Find it here: He lives in Pensacola, Florida with his wife Tanya and three children and remains excited about the tremendous opportunity to lead an apologetics ministry in the war against evolution and humanism. When penned down by fellow scientists of equal status, many in the world of academia merely reply that the origin of life is something that nobody understands. It should be added that Tour went on in his talk to critique other articles that unquestionably are part of the “primary literature,” just like he promised, and he does this even more in his letter to me and in an earlier essay. James Tour is attracting a lot of attention on the Intelligent Design Creationist websites because he is sympathetic to their main claim; namely, that evolution is wrong [see A world-famous chemist tells the truth: there’s no scientist alive today who understands macroevolution]. But if you follow the “About this content” link provided by Nature itself, you find an expanded explanation that makes clear Szostak’s article was vetted and approved by Nature’s regular editorial staff. Dr. Tour is one of the world’s top synthetic organic chemists. One needs to have the double bond shown to one of the oxygen atoms or they are not sugars. Take Gary Hurd, Internet atheist, troll extraordinaire, and the Internet’s main attack dog against Tour right now. Tour went on to explain that the errors he found in the drawings pale in comparison to the biggest problem with Szostak’s Nature article: …all of the above is minor compared to Szostak’s showing that in a single step, heat and light can make a compound that resembles a dehydrated nucleotide (though it is not a nucleotide since it is devoid of any stereochemistry) from “simple sugars” and “cyanide derivatives.” …The major issue is that heat and light cannot afford that conversion from ethylene glycol, glycerol, or the sugar products derived thereupon after their oxidation to the aldehydes. To present that heat and UV light can act on these compounds (even if we are to use these 2 and 3 carbon simple sugars rather than glycerol and ethylene glycol, and to use any simple cyanide derivative) to afford anything like the listed “RNA nucleotide” (albeit not a nucleotide since it shows no stereochemistry) is incorrect and misleading. It is an honor to be so asked. My behavior was inappropriate. At one point, Tour got a bit carried away while critiquing an article by Nobel laureate Jack Szostak, one of the world’s top origin of life researchers. I have already apologized to Jack Szostak by phone, and he very graciously accepted the apology. That is Trumpian. I mean, ab initio, I make molecules. I understand how hard it is to make molecules. The lecture has already attracted over 74,000 views on YouTube — for good reason. Renowned scientist James Tour at Rice University is facing the wrath of Internet trolls because of his candid evaluation of origin of life research in a recent public lecture in Dallas. The Coronavirus: Dr. Andrew Fabich Gives Us the Facts, Flat Earth Enthusiast “Mad” Mike Killed in Rocket Crash. The petition states "we are skeptical of claims for the ability of random mutation and natural selection to account for the complexity of life. I have written several times for the News and Views section of Nature and Nature series journals. Lennox: Atheists’ Best Objection to Theism? 4. Some further background might help you better appreciate the chutzpah of these claims. Therefore, as drawn, the organic starting materials are glycerol (1,2,3-propanetriol or glycerin), ethylene glycol (1,2-ethanediol), diaminomethane (methanediamine), and 1-aminopropane. Gonzalez Extends “Privileged Planet” Arguments, A Disappointing Decade for Human Evolution. Hurd is the one who characterizes Tour as a “Liar for Jesus.” He also says: “James Tour lies his ass off for money, adulation, and I suppose his hopes for salvation.” Hurd (whose doctorate is in “Social Science,” not chemistry) goes on to accuse Tour of telling “15 lies in under 4 minutes counting repeated lies.
Xbox 360 Wireless Speed Wheel Pc Drivers,
Brooklynn Proulx Age,
Ftse Bursa Malaysia Mid 70 Index,
Ontario Crime Rate Map,
International Delight Iced Coffee Caramel Macchiato Light,
Paolo Soleri Documentary,
Pokemon Sword Expansion Release Date,